Activator Methods International Ltd.
2950 N. Seventh Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85014

ofc 602-224-0220
fax 602-224-0230
toll free 1-800-598-0224

Research Information

Title: Active Trunk Extensor Contributions to Dynamic Posteroanterior Lumbar Spinal Stiffness

Reference: Christopher J. Colloca, DC,a and Tony S. Keller, PhDb J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27:229-37

ABSTRACT:
Background: Assessments of posteroanterior (PA) spinal stiffness using mobilization apparatuses have demonstrated an increase in PA spine stiffness during voluntary contraction of the lumbar extensor muscles; yet, little work has been done to this degree in symptomatic subjects.

Objective: To use a previously validated dynamic mechanical impedance procedure to quantify changes in PA dynamic spinal stiffness at rest and during lumbar isotonic extension tasks in patients with low back pain (LBP),

Methods: Thirteen patients with LBP underwent a dynamic spinal stiffness assessment in the prone-resting position and again during lumbar extensor efforts. Stiffness assessments were obtained using a handheld impulsive mechanical device equipped with an impedance head (load cell and accelerometer). PA manipulative thrusts ( ~ 150 N, <5 milliseconds) were delivered to skin overlying the L3 left and right transverse processes (TPs) and to the L3 spinous process (SP) in a predefined order (left TP, SP, right TP) while patients were at rest and again during prone-lying lumbar isotonic extension tasks. Dynamic spinal stiffness characteristics were determined from force and acceleration measurements using the apparent mass (peak force/peak acceleration, kg). Apparent mass measurements for the resting and active lumbar isotonic task trials of each patient were compared using a 2-tailed, paired t test.

Results: A significant increase in the PA dynamic spinal stiffness was noted for thrusts over the SP (apparent mass (17,0%], P= ,0004) during isotonic trunk extension tasks compared with prone resting, but no statistically significant changes in apparent mass were noted for the same measures over the TPs.

Conclusions: These findings add support to the significance of the trunk musculature and spinal posture in providing increased spinal stability.

Key Indexing Terms: Apparent Mass; Biomechanics; Electromyography; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Spine; Chiropractic; Manipulation; Muscle Coactivation; Stiffness; Stability

a Private practice of chiropractic, Phoenix, Ariz; Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz,
b Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt.